Skip to main content

Living in the Ocean of God

 

Living in the Ocean of God

‘God and the world live together in a mutual coinhabitation, mutually immanent to, and caught up with, one another in a mutual adventure of relationality and creativity, compassion and beauty, love and surprise’ (Faber 2019, 59).
Roland Faber, The Ocean of God
What if God is not somewhere “up there,” watching the world from a safe distance, but is instead living with us—deeply involved, responsive, and vulnerable to what happens here and now? That is the unsettling and deeply hopeful vision offered by theologian Roland Faber, who writes that “God and the world live together in a mutual coinhabitation, mutually immanent to, and caught up with, one another in a mutual adventure of relationality and creativity, compassion and beauty, love and surprise.”
This is not the God many people imagine. The familiar picture—especially in popular religion—is of an all-powerful, all-knowing being who stands above history, unmoved by pain and untouched by change. In that view, God controls everything, while the world plays out like a prewritten script. Faber’s image could not be more different. Here, God is not hovering above the world but immersed in it, intertwined with its struggles and hopes, affected by what unfolds.
To say that God and the world “coinhabit” is a radical claim. It means they live together, not side by side but in one another. God is present within the world, and the world, in turn, lives within God. This does not collapse God into nature or reduce the divine to the sum of all things. Rather, it suggests a relationship so intimate that what happens in the world genuinely matters to God. History is not merely observed by God; it is felt.
Faber’s language of “adventure” is especially striking. Adventures involve risk. They unfold without guaranteed outcomes. They surprise. In this vision, creation is not a finished project but an ongoing process, one in which God has chosen to be deeply involved. The future is not locked in—even God, in a sense, awaits it. This does not weaken God; it redefines divine power as the courage to love without controlling, to create without coercing.
That shift changes how we think about suffering. If God is truly caught up in the world’s life, then God is not indifferent to pain. Divine compassion is not distant sympathy but close, shared vulnerability. Human suffering—whether from war, injustice, illness, or ecological collapse—is not something God merely “allows” from afar. It touches God. It becomes part of the divine experience. In a time when many people struggle to believe in a God who seems silent in the face of enormous suffering, this matters. A God who suffers with the world is not an answer to every question, but it may be a God worth wrestling with.
This way of thinking also reshapes how we understand beauty. Beauty here is not static perfection or timeless harmony. It is something fragile and emerging, born through relationships, creativity, and care. Think of beauty not as escape from the world’s brokenness, but as what sometimes rises out of it: acts of compassion during crisis, moments of reconciliation, unexpected solidarity. In Faber’s vision, God is not only the source of beauty but a participant in its creation, delighting in moments that even God did not fully foresee.
There are serious ethical implications to all this. If the world lives in God, then what we do to the world matters at the deepest theological level. Environmental destruction, for example, is not just a technical problem or a moral failure—it is an injury to a relationship that includes God. Conversely, caring for the earth, protecting vulnerable lives, and working for justice become ways of cooperating with the divine life itself. Ethics becomes participation, not obedience to distant commands.
Perhaps the most challenging word in Faber’s description is the last one: surprise. A God open to surprise is a God who does not micromanage reality. This unsettles those who want certainty and guarantees. But it may also make faith more honest. Life, after all, is surprising—sometimes painfully so. A God who shares that openness invites humility, attentiveness, and responsibility rather than complacency.
To imagine God and the world living together like this is like stepping into an ocean rather than standing on dry land. You are no longer in control. You are surrounded, supported, and sometimes overwhelmed. But you are also alive in a new way. In the “ocean of God,” faith is not about escaping the world or waiting for rescue from it. It is about learning to live more deeply within it—trusting that creativity, compassion, beauty, love, and even surprise are not signs of God’s absence, but of God’s intimate and ongoing presence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( from FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)-reproduced verbatim There are several material elements that are often ignored when discussing the issue of ḥijāb or the ‘awrah of women. These elements suggest that the issue of fitnah might have dominated and shaped the discourse on the ‘awrah of women, but they are also informative as to the possible authorial enterprise behind the fitnah traditions. There are six main elements that, I believe, warrant careful examination in trying to analyze the laws of ‘awrah, and that invite us to re-examine the relationship between ‘awrah and fitnah. Firstly, early jurists disagreed on the meaning of zīnah (adornments) that women are commanded to cover. Some jurists argued that it is all of the body including the hair and face except for one eye. The majority argued that women must cover their full body except for the face and hands. Some jurists held that women may expose their feet and their arms up ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Khaled Abou El Fadl's Approach to the Hadith

Khaled Abou El Fadl's   Approach to the Hadith Khaled Abou El Fadl (b.1963) is one of the most distinguished scholars of Islamic law today. He is also one of the few progressive Muslim scholars who has fully engaged with the postmodern episteme, post-enlightenment hermeneutics, and literary theory, as well as applied them in relation to gen­der issues in Islam, including the interpretation of hadith pertaining to gender. Much of his Qur’anic hermeneutics and approach to Islamic jurisprudence is in agreement with scholars such as mohsen Kadivar and nasr Abu Zayd , and need not be repeated. However, El Fadl’s work also includes discussions pertaining to (in)determinacy of meaning, ambiguity of textual hermeneu­tics, and the process of meaning derivation as employed, for example, in literary theory and semiotics (which he has applied to both Qur’an and hadith texts) (El Fadl, 2001, 88). El Fadl has systematically engaged in these discussions and has applied them to the issue ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Expert Witness Report on Gender Interactions and Women Clothing in the Islamic Tradition

    Expert Witness Report on Gender Interactions and Women Clothing in the Islamic Tradition    Adis Duderija    The injunctions pertaining to women clothing in the Islamic interpretive tradition and gender relations in general (primarily Islamic jurisprudence known as fiqh) are result of interpretive processes that have taken several centuries to form. What is today considered four mainstream Sunni Islamic schools of law only reached large degree of hermeneutical stability   after over 400 years of juristic and legal methodology reasoning (Hallaq 2004 ; Jackson 2002). Jackson, who uses   a Darwinian metaphor of the survival of the fittest, describes   this process of the formation of mainstream Sunnism   as follows   by the end of the 4th/10th century, the madhhab had emerged as the exclusive repository of legal authority. From this point on, all interpretive activity, if it was to be sanctioned and recognized as aut...
Post a Comment
Read more