Skip to main content

Why Islamic Thought Needs a Hermeneutical Revolution

 

Why Islamic Thought Needs a Hermeneutical Revolution

By Adis Duderija

In an age where religious discourse is often reduced to soundbites, legalism, or ideological posturing, the edited volume Philosophical Hermeneutics and Islamic Thought (Springer, 2022) offers a bold and necessary intervention. It argues that the future of Islamic thought hinges not on new rulings or apologetics, but on a deeper rethinking of what it means to interpret—indeed, to understand—within a living tradition.

This is not merely a call to apply Western hermeneutics to Islamic texts. Rather, the volume stages a two-way conversation: Islamic intellectual traditions are not passive recipients of European theory but active interlocutors capable of reshaping the very horizons of hermeneutics itself. The result is a rich, multi-vocal collection that spans classical philosophy, Sufism, political theology, and contemporary reformist thought.

At its heart lies a simple yet profound insight: interpretation is not a technical exercise in decoding texts. It is an existential, communal, and metaphysical act. Whether through Avicenna’s poetics, Ibn ʿArabī’s concept of ḥayra (perplexity), or Shabestari’s historically aware Qur’anic hermeneutics, the contributors show that understanding is a way of being that is rooted in tradition, but open to transformation.

This shift has urgent implications. In a time when Islamic legal discourse often struggles to address modern ethical and social realities, the volume’s emphasis on epistemic humility, interpretive openness, and metaphysical depth is a welcome corrective. It challenges both the rigidity of textual literalism and the shallowness of politicised theology. As Syed Mustafa Ali warns, when ontology is reduced to ideology, theology becomes thin—and so does our humanity.

The volume’s concluding provocation, Sylvain Camilleri’s call for a “devilish hermeneutics,” is especially striking. It urges us to resist the comfort of closure and embrace the undecidability that has always haunted sacred texts. This is not relativism. It is a deeper fidelity to the tradition—one that remembers its own internal debates, counter-readings, and interpretive risks.

As a scholar of Islamic thought, I believe two tasks are now urgent. First, we must re-embed hermeneutics in philosophical anthropology and metaphysics. What we think a human being is shapes what meanings we can responsibly derive from scripture. Second, we must engage more deeply with process-relational philosophy, where becoming, relation, and value are not afterthoughts but ontological foundations. This is why I have launched a book series on Islam and Process-Relational Thought—to foster precisely this kind of cross-pollination.

Philosophical Hermeneutics and Islamic Thought is not just a book. It is a manifesto for a more honest, rigorous, and spiritually generative Islamic intellectual future. It deserves to be read widely—not only by scholars of Islam, but by anyone who believes that interpretation is a sacred responsibility.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( from FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)-reproduced verbatim There are several material elements that are often ignored when discussing the issue of ḥijāb or the ‘awrah of women. These elements suggest that the issue of fitnah might have dominated and shaped the discourse on the ‘awrah of women, but they are also informative as to the possible authorial enterprise behind the fitnah traditions. There are six main elements that, I believe, warrant careful examination in trying to analyze the laws of ‘awrah, and that invite us to re-examine the relationship between ‘awrah and fitnah. Firstly, early jurists disagreed on the meaning of zīnah (adornments) that women are commanded to cover. Some jurists argued that it is all of the body including the hair and face except for one eye. The majority argued that women must cover their full body except for the face and hands. Some jurists held that women may expose their feet and their arms up ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Khaled Abou El Fadl's Approach to the Hadith

Khaled Abou El Fadl's   Approach to the Hadith Khaled Abou El Fadl (b.1963) is one of the most distinguished scholars of Islamic law today. He is also one of the few progressive Muslim scholars who has fully engaged with the postmodern episteme, post-enlightenment hermeneutics, and literary theory, as well as applied them in relation to gen­der issues in Islam, including the interpretation of hadith pertaining to gender. Much of his Qur’anic hermeneutics and approach to Islamic jurisprudence is in agreement with scholars such as mohsen Kadivar and nasr Abu Zayd , and need not be repeated. However, El Fadl’s work also includes discussions pertaining to (in)determinacy of meaning, ambiguity of textual hermeneu­tics, and the process of meaning derivation as employed, for example, in literary theory and semiotics (which he has applied to both Qur’an and hadith texts) (El Fadl, 2001, 88). El Fadl has systematically engaged in these discussions and has applied them to the issue ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Expert Witness Report on Gender Interactions and Women Clothing in the Islamic Tradition

    Expert Witness Report on Gender Interactions and Women Clothing in the Islamic Tradition    Adis Duderija    The injunctions pertaining to women clothing in the Islamic interpretive tradition and gender relations in general (primarily Islamic jurisprudence known as fiqh) are result of interpretive processes that have taken several centuries to form. What is today considered four mainstream Sunni Islamic schools of law only reached large degree of hermeneutical stability   after over 400 years of juristic and legal methodology reasoning (Hallaq 2004 ; Jackson 2002). Jackson, who uses   a Darwinian metaphor of the survival of the fittest, describes   this process of the formation of mainstream Sunnism   as follows   by the end of the 4th/10th century, the madhhab had emerged as the exclusive repository of legal authority. From this point on, all interpretive activity, if it was to be sanctioned and recognized as aut...
Post a Comment
Read more