Unveiling the
Problems with Classical Theism
Adis Duderija
Throughout history,
classical theism(I use the word here in the sense of approaches to concept of God as
espoused by Aristotle, Augustine and Ghazali to new some famous examples) has shaped religious traditions, defining the
ideal believer through concepts of obedience, liturgical piety, and devotion.
However, an urgent need exists to reassess these traditional paradigms and
redefine religious authenticity in ways that prioritize multiperspectivity,
creativity, and appreciation for original and contextualized thought. This short
piece outlines the problematic aspects of classical theism,
shedding light on its reinforcement of patriarchal structures, the presence of
eschatological thinking, the notion of eternal damnation, and the enforcement
of rigid beliefs.
I. The Patriarchal
Foundations of Classical Theism:
Feminist theology has
played a pivotal role in exposing the inherent problems within classical theism
over the past five decades. By perpetuating a patriarchal understanding of God,
this theological framework reinforces hierarchical ontologies that permeate all
facets of society. The resulting male privilege manifests in the structure and
governance of civilizations, perpetuating gender inequalities and hindering
progress toward gender equity.
II. Eschatological
Thinking and Its Implications:
Classical theism,
particularly in Christian and Islamic variations, often embraces eschatological
thinking, rooted in their respective scriptures. This emphasis on apocalyptic
visions has led to the emergence of puritanical sects that ardently pursue the
fulfillment of these prophecies. Throughout history, such extremist groups,
including recent examples like ISIS, have fervently sought to bring about the
apocalypse or have based their ideologies on these eschatological narratives.
This apocalyptic mindset can disrupt social and political stability,
potentially leading to violence and conflicts.
III. The Damaging
Effects of the Notion of Eternal Damnation:
One of the most
troubling aspects of classical theism lies in its promotion of the idea of
eternal hell and damnation. Orthodox institutions have wielded this concept to
exert control and manipulate their followers. By instilling fear and enforcing
strict adherence to dogma, the notion of eternal damnation stifles intellectual
inquiry and suppresses alternative interpretations. This absolutist control not
only hampers individual growth but also undermines the potential for religious
pluralism and dialogue.
IV. Repression and
Violence in the Face of Apostasy:
Classical theism has a
long history of enforcing "correct" belief and doctrine, often
through violent means. Dissenters, particularly free thinkers and women who
challenge orthodoxy, have been targeted and persecuted. The fear of apostasy
threatens the social order envisioned by religious institutions, leading to
egregious acts of violence and oppression. This suppression of divergent
beliefs restricts intellectual diversity and inhibits societal progress.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the
problems inherent in classical theism necessitate a critical examination and a
call for reform. By redefining religious authenticity through a lens of
multiperspectivity, creativity, and contextualized thought, we can forge a more
inclusive and tolerant religious landscape. It is crucial to address the
patriarchal foundations of classical theism, the potentially destabilizing
effects of eschatological thinking, the damaging notion of eternal damnation,
and the violence associated with the enforcement of rigid beliefs. By
undertaking these reforms, we can foster a more compassionate, intellectually
vibrant, and harmonious society.
Comments
Post a Comment