Here is the link ..I just completed reading the book and highly recommend it :http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/85ac8582-9b62-11df-8239-00144feab49a.html#axzz3BkoS6xeB
ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)-reproduced verbatim There are several material elements that are often ignored when discussing the issue of ḥijāb or the ‘awrah of women. These elements suggest that the issue of fitnah might have dominated and shaped the discourse on the ‘awrah of women, but they are also informative as to the possible authorial enterprise behind the fitnah traditions. There are six main elements that, I believe, warrant careful examination in trying to analyze the laws of ‘awrah, and that invite us to re-examine the relationship between ‘awrah and fitnah. Firstly, early jurists disagreed on the meaning of zīnah (adornments) that women are commanded to cover. Some jurists argued that it is all of the body including the hair and face except for one eye. The majority argued that women must cover their full body except for the face and hands. Some jurists held that women may expose their feet and their arms up ...
Interesting.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I try to find the balance while recognizing that the Qur'an is on the only revelation that has withstood any addition/substraction/distortion to it's original (revelation from God) by accidental or deliberate processes over the centuries while I recognize that I am inadequate to cast judgement on each person who have not been as a Muslim.