Embracing the Fluidity of Divine Revelation: Amina Wadud's Vision for an Inclusive Qur'anic Interpretation "There has never been one static notion of what it means that the Qur an is the literal word of God/Allah. Consensus does not exist. There is however endless debate about whether any speech-act or text can capture the totality of divine sovereignty. Because of the breadth of those discussions, I am never inclined to say that either we take it all or we must take nothing. Actually trying to capture both the transcendent nature of the sacred and the concrete manifestation that revelation becomes as it solidifies into text is one of the saving graces to these discourses over the application of text to real lives and real policies, and to the transformation of ethical and moral standpoints. As soon as we acknowledge that none can know fully what Allah meant, then the door is open to both patriarchal and feminist egalitarian readings. " amina wadud in https:...
The Prophets Were Visionaries, Not Scholars: Why Religious Fundamentalism Is Holding Us Back Adis Duderija In an era of rapid scientific advancement and global interconnectedness, it's tempting to view ancient religious figures through a modern lens—as profound philosophers or rigorous theologians whose words form the bedrock of eternal truths. But this is a profound misunderstanding. The prophets of traditional religions, from Moses and Isaiah in Judaism to Muhammad in Islam and the seers of Hinduism's Vedas, were not scholars poring over texts in ivory towers. They were visionary preachers and mystics, speaking in kerygmatic bursts of proclamation and theopoetic flourishes of divine poetry. They weren't constructing systematic theologies or debating metaphysics (e.g. like Plato or Aquinas). This fundamental truth is what religious fundamentalism and traditionalism stubbornly refuse to acknowledge, ensuring their role as regressive forces in our contemporary worl...