Skip to main content

Embracing Rationalism, Feminism, Sufism, and Process-Relational Theology: A Personal Journey

 

Embracing Rationalism, Feminism, Sufism, and Process-Relational Theology: A Personal Journey

 

 Adis Duderija 

In a world characterized by diverse philosophical and theological perspectives, I find myself embracing a unique blend of rationalism, feminism, Sufism, and process-relational theology. While these may seem like disparate strands of thought, they intertwine harmoniously in my worldview, shaping my understanding of the self, society, and spirituality. In this short piece  I will share my personal journey and shed light on the ways in which these philosophical and theological frameworks have enriched my life and perspectives.

 

Rationalism: Nurturing the Power of Reason

 

As a rationalist, I place great emphasis on the power of reason and critical thinking. Rationalism encourages us to question assumptions, challenge dogmas, and seek evidence-based knowledge. It empowers me to navigate the complexities of life with an open and skeptical mind, always striving for intellectual honesty and coherence. Rationalism provides a solid foundation for my philosophical and theological inquiries, enabling me to engage with ideas and beliefs in a thoughtful and analytical manner.

 

Feminism: Advocating for Equality and Justice

 

My commitment to feminism stems from a deep-seated belief in the inherent equality and dignity of all individuals, regardless of gender. Feminism challenges oppressive structures, stereotypes, and gender norms, advocating for equal opportunities and rights for all. It inspires me to actively work towards dismantling patriarchal systems and fostering inclusivity and justice in all spheres of life. Feminism informs my understanding of social dynamics, highlighting the importance of intersectionality and amplifying marginalized voices.

 

Sufism: Seeking Spiritual Wisdom and Unity

 

Sufism, the mystical branch of Islam, plays a significant role in shaping my spiritual journey. It emphasizes the inward search for divine knowledge and the cultivation of a personal relationship with the Divine. Sufism's teachings of love, compassion, and spiritual unity resonate deeply with me. It encourages me to embrace the beauty of diversity and seek harmony between the material and the spiritual realms. Sufism's emphasis on introspection, mindfulness, and the pursuit of inner peace provides a valuable compass for navigating life's challenges.

 

Process-Relational Theology: Embracing Dynamic and Interconnected Existence

 

Process-relational theology offers a framework that complements and enriches my philosophical and theological perspectives. It views reality as a dynamic and interdependent web of relationships. Instead of static entities, it understands the world in terms of evolving processes and interactions. Process-relational theology invites us to perceive God as an immanent and evolving presence, intimately engaged with the world. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of all beings and the co-creative nature of existence, inspiring a sense of responsibility and care for the well-being of all.

 

 

While each of these frameworks brings its own unique insights and perspectives, I find that they synergize harmoniously in my worldview. Rationalism provides the tools to critically engage with ideas and beliefs, ensuring intellectual coherence. Feminism challenges me to dismantle oppressive structures and work towards a more just and inclusive society. Sufism offers spiritual guidance, fostering a deep sense of connection and unity with the Divine and all creation. Process-relational theology complements these perspectives by providing a framework that emphasizes the interconnectedness and dynamic nature of existence.

 

 

Embracing this multifaceted worldview has practical implications in my daily life. It informs the choices I make, the causes I support, and the relationships I cultivate. It encourages me to engage in meaningful dialogue and bridge gaps between diverse perspectives. It inspires me to seek justice and equality, championing the rights of the marginalized. It guides me towards nurturing empathy, compassion, and love in my interactions with others. This integrated worldview provides a sense of purpose and direction, enabling me to navigate the complexities of life with intentionality and authenticity.

 

 

My journey as a rationalist philosophical pro-feminist progressive Sufi and process-relational theologian has been a profound and enriching experience. This unique blend of perspectives has shaped my understanding of the self, society, and spirituality. Through rationalism, feminism, Sufism, and process-relational theology, I have found intellectual coherence, a commitment to justice and equality, spiritual solace, and a deep appreciation for the interconnectedness of existence. It is through the integration and synthesis of these diverse frameworks that I continue to explore and navigate life's profound questions, seeking to contribute to a more inclusive, compassionate, and harmonious world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( from FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)-reproduced verbatim There are several material elements that are often ignored when discussing the issue of ḥijāb or the ‘awrah of women. These elements suggest that the issue of fitnah might have dominated and shaped the discourse on the ‘awrah of women, but they are also informative as to the possible authorial enterprise behind the fitnah traditions. There are six main elements that, I believe, warrant careful examination in trying to analyze the laws of ‘awrah, and that invite us to re-examine the relationship between ‘awrah and fitnah. Firstly, early jurists disagreed on the meaning of zīnah (adornments) that women are commanded to cover. Some jurists argued that it is all of the body including the hair and face except for one eye. The majority argued that women must cover their full body except for the face and hands. Some jurists held that women may expose their feet and their arms up

Khaled Abou El Fadl's Approach to the Hadith

Khaled Abou El Fadl's   Approach to the Hadith Khaled Abou El Fadl (b.1963) is one of the most distinguished scholars of Islamic law today. He is also one of the few progressive Muslim scholars who has fully engaged with the postmodern episteme, post-enlightenment hermeneutics, and literary theory, as well as applied them in relation to gen­der issues in Islam, including the interpretation of hadith pertaining to gender. Much of his Qur’anic hermeneutics and approach to Islamic jurisprudence is in agreement with scholars such as mohsen Kadivar and nasr Abu Zayd , and need not be repeated. However, El Fadl’s work also includes discussions pertaining to (in)determinacy of meaning, ambiguity of textual hermeneu­tics, and the process of meaning derivation as employed, for example, in literary theory and semiotics (which he has applied to both Qur’an and hadith texts) (El Fadl, 2001, 88). El Fadl has systematically engaged in these discussions and has applied them to the issue of wo

A Reply to ‘Abdul Haq Al-Ashanti’s “Critique” of My articles on Neo-Traditional Salafi construction of the Religious Other

A Reply to ‘Abdul Haq Al-Ashanti ’s “Critique” of My articles on Neo-Traditional Salafi construction of the Religious Other By Adis Duderija, Ph.D. Couple of months ago I was contacted by email by AbdulHaq ibn Kofi ibn Kwesi al-Ashanti   who informed me that he wrote a ‘ critique ’ of my two articles on what I term Neo-traditional Salafi (NTS) construction of the Religious Other  (the articles in question can be read here and here ) in which he has made a number of erroneous claims about my work that deserve unequivocal refutation. More importantly,  ‘Abdul  Haqq’s  ‘critique’ warrants attention  because it illustrates well  the problematic nature of more mainstream classical Sunni manahij ( sg. manhaj) on not only the normative relationship between the Muslim Self and the Religious other but also on other issues pertaining to gender , violence and tolerance. REPLY TO POINT ONE: ‘Abdul Haq starts his ‘critique’ by rightly complaining that the label as well as the concept