Why the Highly Gendered Nature of Classical Islamic Law Demands Critical Reassessment Adis Duderija One of the most common claims made in contemporary discussions of Islam and gender is that men and women are "equal but different." According to this view, the distinctions made within classical Islamic law do not reflect male superiority or female inferiority but simply different roles, responsibilities, and social functions. Yet a close examination of the classical legal tradition suggests otherwise. The issue is not merely that men and women are treated differently. Rather, the legal system itself was constructed upon a set of assumptions about masculinity and femininity that consistently privileged men while limiting the autonomy, authority, and agency of women. The highly gendered character of classical Islamic law becomes apparent when one considers the sheer breadth of legal distinctions between men and women. These differences extended far beyond marriage and family ...
On the Concept of a (Woman) Saint Adis Duderija What comes to mind when we hear the phrase woman saint? For many, the image is almost predetermined: a figure of purity, obedience, humility, and self-sacrifice. She is patient under suffering, submissive to authority, and detached from worldly ambition. Such qualities may indeed characterize some women recognized as saints. Yet, as Robert Ellsberg perceptively observes, these conventional portraits often tell us as much about the expectations of those who wrote the stories as they do about the women themselves. The history of sainthood has largely been written by men, shaped by institutions dominated by male religious authorities. As a result, women saints have frequently been celebrated for embodying virtues deemed appropriately feminine while other traits have been minimized or ignored. Courage becomes obedience. Leadership becomes service. Intellectual brilliance becomes pi...