Skip to main content

The Inconvenient Truth About Muslim Diversity: Why Progressives, Liberals, Secularists, and Cultural Muslims Are the Real Face of Islam

 

The Inconvenient Truth About Muslim Diversity: Why Progressives, Liberals, Secularists, and Cultural Muslims Are the Real Face of Islam


Adis Duderija

In an era of polarizing headlines and echo-chamber debates, there's an inconvenient truth that shatters the narratives pushed by both Islamophobes and fundamentalist Muslims: the vast majority of the world's 1.9 billion Muslims aren't the rigid traditionalists or dogmatic enforcers that extremists on either side would have us believe. Instead, they are progressives, liberals, secularists, and cultural adherents who embrace Islam not as a straitjacket of rules, but as a civilisational and cultural heritage that in some forms can offer a  profound moral and ethical framework. And crucially, these Muslims are no less Islamic for it—their views stem from deep conviction, rooted in thoughtful interpretation of the faith, not some watered-down compromise or external pressure.

Let's dispense with the myths. Islamophobes paint Muslims as a monolithic horde of zealots, while fundamentalist and dogmatic traditionalists insist that only their literalist interpretations count as "true" Islam. Both are wrong, and the data proves it. Far from being fringe outliers, progressive and liberal Muslims represent a vibrant, growing mainstream, driven by a sincere belief that Islam evolves with humanity's quest for justice, equality, and modernity.

Consider the evidence from global research, starting with attitudes toward Islamic law. The Pew Research Center's extensive surveys reveal that while many Muslims support sharia in a symbolic or ethical sense—as a guide for personal morality or family matters—support for harsh, punitive, or literalist applications is strikingly low. Majorities in countries across the Muslim world reject extreme punishments, favoring instead interpretations that emphasize compassion, human rights, and social justice. This isn't apathy or Western influence; it's conviction. Progressives and liberals see this as fidelity to Islam's core teachings of mercy and equity, not a betrayal. They are Islamic precisely because they choose to interpret the faith in ways that align with its timeless principles, adapting them to contemporary realities without diluting their essence.

This progressive ethos isn't some niche academic trend—it's a burgeoning global movement. Scholars and thinkers from Indonesia to the United States are reinterpreting Islamic texts to champion gender equality, LGBTQ+ inclusion, environmental stewardship, and democratic pluralism. These reformers aren't "less Muslim"; they're conviction-driven believers who argue that Islam's emphasis on ijtihad (independent reasoning) demands such evolution. In community spaces, mosques, and online forums, this vision is gaining traction, proving that faith can be a force for progress without losing its soul. Liberals and secular-leaning Muslims, who might prioritize ethical living over ritual observance, embody this conviction by viewing Islam as a moral compass that guides their lives in pluralistic societies, not a rigid code enforced by the state.

Then there's the sheer demographic weight of cultural and secular Muslims—a group often dismissed as "nominal" by purists, but one that's profoundly Islamic in its own right. Long-term studies on value changes, including those from the World Values Survey, show rising secular trends across the Middle East, North Africa, and beyond, with younger generations embracing liberal social attitudes and distancing themselves from authoritarian religious structures. Add to this the millions of cultural Muslims in Europe, Central Asia, the Balkans, and even parts of the Arab world—people who fast during Ramadan, celebrate Eid, and draw inspiration from Islamic heritage while leading largely secular lives—and you see a massive, diverse bloc. These aren't lapsed believers; they're Muslims by conviction, integrating their faith into modern identities that value personal freedom and cultural pride. To call them "less Islamic" is to ignore how Islam has always adapted to local contexts, from Sufi mysticism to African spiritual traditions.

Even among the religiously observant, moderation reigns. Global polls consistently show Muslims overwhelmingly endorsing democracy, religious freedom, and the harmony between Islam and modern life. These aren't the traits of fundamentalism; they're the hallmarks of a pluralistic, ethically grounded faith. Progressives and liberals aren't abandoning Islam—they're reclaiming it from the loud, well-funded minority of dogmatists who dominate the news cycle.

The real story here is one of empowerment and authenticity. Progressives, liberals, secularists, and cultural Muslims aren't diluting the faith; they're living it with conviction, often at great personal risk in conservative societies. They draw from the Quran's calls for justice (adl) and consultation (shura) to advocate for reforms that make Islam relevant and humane in the 21st century. Dismissing them as "not real Muslims" serves only the agendas of extremists—whether Islamophobic bigots seeking to demonize or fundamentalists clinging to power.

If we're serious about understanding Islam today, we must move beyond stereotypes and headlines to embrace the data—and the diverse convictions it reveals. The global Muslim majority is progressive, liberal, secular-leaning, and culturally rich, proving that Islam's strength lies in its adaptability, not its rigidity. It's time for an honest conversation that celebrates this diversity, rather than erasing it. Only then can we build bridges instead of walls.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( from FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)-reproduced verbatim There are several material elements that are often ignored when discussing the issue of ḥijāb or the ‘awrah of women. These elements suggest that the issue of fitnah might have dominated and shaped the discourse on the ‘awrah of women, but they are also informative as to the possible authorial enterprise behind the fitnah traditions. There are six main elements that, I believe, warrant careful examination in trying to analyze the laws of ‘awrah, and that invite us to re-examine the relationship between ‘awrah and fitnah. Firstly, early jurists disagreed on the meaning of zīnah (adornments) that women are commanded to cover. Some jurists argued that it is all of the body including the hair and face except for one eye. The majority argued that women must cover their full body except for the face and hands. Some jurists held that women may expose their feet and their arms up ...

Khaled Abou El Fadl's Approach to the Hadith

Khaled Abou El Fadl's   Approach to the Hadith Khaled Abou El Fadl (b.1963) is one of the most distinguished scholars of Islamic law today. He is also one of the few progressive Muslim scholars who has fully engaged with the postmodern episteme, post-enlightenment hermeneutics, and literary theory, as well as applied them in relation to gen­der issues in Islam, including the interpretation of hadith pertaining to gender. Much of his Qur’anic hermeneutics and approach to Islamic jurisprudence is in agreement with scholars such as mohsen Kadivar and nasr Abu Zayd , and need not be repeated. However, El Fadl’s work also includes discussions pertaining to (in)determinacy of meaning, ambiguity of textual hermeneu­tics, and the process of meaning derivation as employed, for example, in literary theory and semiotics (which he has applied to both Qur’an and hadith texts) (El Fadl, 2001, 88). El Fadl has systematically engaged in these discussions and has applied them to the issue ...

Expert Witness Report on Gender Interactions and Women Clothing in the Islamic Tradition

    Expert Witness Report on Gender Interactions and Women Clothing in the Islamic Tradition    Adis Duderija    The injunctions pertaining to women clothing in the Islamic interpretive tradition and gender relations in general (primarily Islamic jurisprudence known as fiqh) are result of interpretive processes that have taken several centuries to form. What is today considered four mainstream Sunni Islamic schools of law only reached large degree of hermeneutical stability   after over 400 years of juristic and legal methodology reasoning (Hallaq 2004 ; Jackson 2002). Jackson, who uses   a Darwinian metaphor of the survival of the fittest, describes   this process of the formation of mainstream Sunnism   as follows   by the end of the 4th/10th century, the madhhab had emerged as the exclusive repository of legal authority. From this point on, all interpretive activity, if it was to be sanctioned and recognized as aut...