Skip to main content

Introduction to the Indonesian Translation of "Constructing a Religious ideal Believer and Muslim Woman: Neo-Traditional Salafi and progressive muslims Methods of interpretation

 

I am delighted to write this introduction to the Indonesian translation of the first (and favourite) book that I authored and am deeply grateful to everyone involved in the process of its translation and publication. Incidentally, this year marks 10 years since its publication and I cannot think of any better way to celebrate but to make the book available to the Indonesian audience.

The book is a slightly modified version of my Ph.D dissertation that I completed in 2010 at the University of Western Australia and that was subsequently  published in Professor Khaled Abou El Fadl’s book series published by Palgrave in 2011. I am thankful and feel honored that Professor Abou El Fadl took interest in being one of my Ph.D. examiners, for finding it a valuable contribution to scholarship and for encouraging me to publish my work in his book series.  The book was translated into Arabic in 2013 ( available here for free).

In many ways the subject matter of the book is a reflection of the questions I as a Muslim of Bosnian heritage living in Australia was asking myself as I was becoming of age. More specifically, as an undergraduate student I came into contact with Muslims from various ethnic, national  and racial backgrounds  and  was fascinated with the question of differences in understanding and practicing of the Islamic faith that I witnessed. The understanding of the nature of the  concept of sunna was of a particular interest to me in this respect. In mid to late 1990s I came across the works of Fazrul Rahman ( d.1988) and the Pakistani Institute Al-Mawrid whose concept of sunna was markedly different from the more mainstream discussions that  for hermeneutical purposes  conflated the concept of sunna with that of an authentic ( sahih)  hadith. I continued to expand my knowledge of the  early concept of sunna , especially in the early Maliki and Hanafi  madhhab which led to the publication of some of my first academic articles on sunna published in Arab Law quarterly in 2007, 2009 and 2012 respectively . The culmination of my interest in the concept of sunna occurred in my editing of a volume on the concept of sunna in early, classical and modernist periods that was published by Palgrave in 2015 that, as far as I know, is still the most comprehensive scholarly  treatment of  the meaning of  concept of sunna and its evolution in various Islamic sciences.

The differences in understanding of the concept of sunna play an important part in the present study and the study in this respect  is informed by my previous publications on the topic mentioned above but its scope is broader and includes discussions pertaining to differences of interpretation in interpretational methodologies ( manahij) and various presuppositions underpinning them in relation to the Qur’an as well. In this respect the study focuses on two contemporary  interpretational currents whose genealogies go back to the very inception of the Islamic interpretive tradition and compares and contrasts them with respect to their manhaj based commitments. The study then examines how these fundamental differences at the level of interpretational methodologies result in very different views on what it  means to be an ideal Muslim Woman and the relationship between the concept of a muslim and a mu’min. The focus on the question of what it means to be an ideal  “Muslim Woman/Wife” ( and my implication that of an ideal Muslim man/husband)and her role and status in Islam  and the question of the nature of Muslim -non-Muslim relationship/interaction continue to attract a  lot of attention in both scholarly and non-scholarly circles. Answers to these questions  have important implications in Muslim contexts not only in  Indonesia as the most populous Muslim country in the world but also more broadly in relation to Islam- West relations in particular. 

Understanding factors and assumptions at the level of interpretational methodologies which lead to very different understandings and answers to these questions helps us not only to understand the spectrum of different opinions that exist in the Islamic interpretive tradition but also ideally to generate a level of interpretational empathy in relation to those with whom we might passionately  disagree precisely as a result of divergences at the level of the manahij but nonetheless understand where they are coming from and why and how they have arrived at these views. This is exactly one of my most important hopes, namely,  that with the translation of this book into Bahasa Indonesia that the often polarized and polarizing  discussions in Indonesia in relation to the issues this study examines  a higher level of interpretational awareness and tolerance can be reached. My other hope is that this book will stimulate further already very rich and intellectually vibrant and scholarly discussions that are already present in Indonesian scholarly circles.  


Pre-order details

Adis Duderija, August 2021.

 

 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( from FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)

ON HIJAB AND AWRAH OF WOMEN AND SLAVES ( FROM EL FADL’S ‘speaking in God’s name p.481-484)-reproduced verbatim There are several material elements that are often ignored when discussing the issue of ḥijāb or the ‘awrah of women. These elements suggest that the issue of fitnah might have dominated and shaped the discourse on the ‘awrah of women, but they are also informative as to the possible authorial enterprise behind the fitnah traditions. There are six main elements that, I believe, warrant careful examination in trying to analyze the laws of ‘awrah, and that invite us to re-examine the relationship between ‘awrah and fitnah. Firstly, early jurists disagreed on the meaning of zīnah (adornments) that women are commanded to cover. Some jurists argued that it is all of the body including the hair and face except for one eye. The majority argued that women must cover their full body except for the face and hands. Some jurists held that women may expose their feet and their arms up

Khaled Abou El Fadl's Approach to the Hadith

Khaled Abou El Fadl's   Approach to the Hadith Khaled Abou El Fadl (b.1963) is one of the most distinguished scholars of Islamic law today. He is also one of the few progressive Muslim scholars who has fully engaged with the postmodern episteme, post-enlightenment hermeneutics, and literary theory, as well as applied them in relation to gen­der issues in Islam, including the interpretation of hadith pertaining to gender. Much of his Qur’anic hermeneutics and approach to Islamic jurisprudence is in agreement with scholars such as mohsen Kadivar and nasr Abu Zayd , and need not be repeated. However, El Fadl’s work also includes discussions pertaining to (in)determinacy of meaning, ambiguity of textual hermeneu­tics, and the process of meaning derivation as employed, for example, in literary theory and semiotics (which he has applied to both Qur’an and hadith texts) (El Fadl, 2001, 88). El Fadl has systematically engaged in these discussions and has applied them to the issue of wo

A Reply to ‘Abdul Haq Al-Ashanti’s “Critique” of My articles on Neo-Traditional Salafi construction of the Religious Other

A Reply to ‘Abdul Haq Al-Ashanti ’s “Critique” of My articles on Neo-Traditional Salafi construction of the Religious Other By Adis Duderija, Ph.D. Couple of months ago I was contacted by email by AbdulHaq ibn Kofi ibn Kwesi al-Ashanti   who informed me that he wrote a ‘ critique ’ of my two articles on what I term Neo-traditional Salafi (NTS) construction of the Religious Other  (the articles in question can be read here and here ) in which he has made a number of erroneous claims about my work that deserve unequivocal refutation. More importantly,  ‘Abdul  Haqq’s  ‘critique’ warrants attention  because it illustrates well  the problematic nature of more mainstream classical Sunni manahij ( sg. manhaj) on not only the normative relationship between the Muslim Self and the Religious other but also on other issues pertaining to gender , violence and tolerance. REPLY TO POINT ONE: ‘Abdul Haq starts his ‘critique’ by rightly complaining that the label as well as the concept